"Open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah."
- The President of the United States, speaking on social media, to the nation he started an unjustified and illegal war with, on Easter Sunday, 2026
I don't know if this gets talked about enough, but there's a certain nihilism that comes with living under a regime that thrives on so much chaos and a distinct lack of accountability. I've never voted for Trump; there was never a time when I thought he was remotely a promising candidate. But a small part of me *wanted* him to get elected the first time, because I thought people would see what a mistake it was and learn their lesson. That they'd find the proof when they bit into the pudding. In hindsight, that was naive. The idiots who voted for him learned nothing, and just doubled down.
I knew better the second time he got elected - I talked to people who were sure this country would never make that mistake twice. I voted against him, but I wasn't even a little bit surprised when he won again. (Even after supporting a failed insurrection against the Capitol, when he lost the people's vote in 2020). I also no longer harbored the hope that the country would see the error of its ways. We were too far gone. But that's changed in the last year, as I've become politically activated, and watched the resistance grow. Especially in the last few months, since the passing of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (and the Department of Justice's subsequent egregious coverup), it feels like the wind has changed direction. The shootings in Minneapolis as recently as January seemed like an inflection point. And then the way this ill-conceived war with Iran is hitting citizens in their pocketbooks at the gas pumps (because that's what it takes to get most Americans to pay attention to politics). Even strands of the MAGA movement are beginning to turn against Trump.
That said, we've come so much further than we should have had to, and have suffered not just a corrupt, but an outright criminal regime, that is not only unburdened by a dedication to law and order, but disdainful of the Constitution our nation was founded on, for so much longer than makes any kind of rational sense, that it's impossible to wrap your mind around how it's been allowed to happen. And you can't help wondering, with every act of insanity perpetrated by this loose cannon of a Commander in Chief, will this be the straw that breaks the camel's back? And by that, I'm not even sure whether I mean breaking the back of the regime's support, or breaking the back of democracy in the United States.
But, to get to my point, there's a part of me buried deep down - a nihilistic impulse, perhaps fueled by Edgar Allan Poe's Imp of the Perverse - that takes a mad glee in the unhinged acts of a despotic President. And again, I'm torn between understanding it as the vindictive hope that all the people responsible (mainly every Republican voter in this country) will finally get what they deserve, and be destroyed by the troll they've maliciously granted unchecked power to, and understanding it as the vain wish that this will be the bridge too far, that wakes the masses up from their dangerous delusion. I WANT Trump to become more and more unhinged. I WANT the world to fall further apart due to his actions. I WANT our country to crash and burn. Because it will vindicate what we've all been saying all this time. And no Republican voter will ever be able to reason with a straight face - unless they are a straight up anarchic lunatic - that they made the right choice for themselves and for the country. (Of course, that falls prey to the fallacy that these people are capable of reason in the first place).
I don't REALLY want these things to happen. I want to wake up tomorrow with a dignified president, and find myself in a prosperous country where I can feel secure, and actually AFFORD to live in. But if the last 10 years or so are any indication (the Biden administration being a blip on the radar, that only proves that safety and security can never be more than a temporary distraction from reality), there's no realistic chance of that happening. Because anything other than total annihiliation will just leave the opposition free to maintain their collective delusion, and continue in their unceasing efforts to burn the world down. So let it burn already. Calling their bluff seems like the ONLY way to deflate their insane arguments. The only problem is that if Trump's dementia actually incites a new World War leading to nuclear apocalypse (an outcome whose possibility MAY be small, but is uncomfortably far from zero), there'll be nobody left to enjoy it. Or if there are, they will be in so much pain and suffering, that it will outweigh the joy in saying, "I told you so."
Update: I wanna get this update posted before 8pm tonight (Tuesday, April 7), in case we're all dead by dawn. Even if it turns out to be the not unlikely case that Trump is bluffing, there should still be repercussions for the President threatening genocide and implicating a nuclear strike. And if he actually goes through with it? Pity there's no God to help us all. In his own words:
"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. Tonight [will be] one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World."
06 April, 2026
13 January, 2026
Bad Faith
This is an argument I've come across recently, and I wanted to address it. In regards to the current administration's immigration policy, "I like immigrants, I just expect them to follow the law" (e.g., to seek and not circumvent legal citizenship), is a bad faith argument. It's an underhanded attempt to legitimize an illegitimate stance (like saying that preventing access to contraceptive health care options has anything to do with being "pro-life", and not anti-freedom), but it is a strategy that conservatives in this country wield frequently and - unfortunately - quite effectively.
The reason this strategy works is because the argument is sound - it's just deliberately misplaced. As I learned while studying philosophy in college, an argument founded on untrue premises can lead logically to a conclusion that is, however, very much untrue. If all ICE were doing was humanely deporting undocumented immigrants, then a focus on proper documentation would be a valid stance. One that you could agree or disagree with (personally, I think the harms are exaggerated, and I support a more empathetic solution in line with our country's historical character), but a valid one nonetheless.
They want you to think that this is all ICE is doing, because it's the only way they can at least pretend their argument has any real footing. But that's not what's really going on. In addition to their purported duties, ICE has been abducting documented immigrants, harassing and assaulting natural born citizens, spreading terror in American communities disproportionately inhabited by Democratic voters (this is not a coincidence), overstepping their authority as border guards (and not domestic law enforcement), recruiting with abysmally low standards and providing inadequate training, eschewing any commitment to transparency (while the administration boldly lies to the contrary) with regards to what goes on inside ICE facilities, how detainees are treated, and what happens to them when they are deported.
All of this is beyond the scope of merely enforcing the law as it is written, and this is what the American people are protesting. For the sake of all that is Good in the world, a white woman was just shot to death in the face by an ICE agent without due cause (the video evidence is all over the internet, so you can judge for yourself), and the administration - up to and including the office of the President of the United States himself - is spreading lies any citizen can debunk with their own eyes, maliciously slandering the innocent woman who was killed, and granting unqualified immunity to her shooter, while obstructing any and all attempts by local or state law enforcement to properly investigate the crime.
This is what enrages us! And conservatives are standing behind all of this egregious behavior, twisting themselves into pretzels to justify this state-sanctioned execution of a law-abiding citizen (in broad daylight!), utilizing bad faith arguments to create the illusion that this is a two-sided issue. And it is an illusion. A thinly-veiled one, at that. And as long as we permit this regime to continue to circumvent the law (and any standard of human decency) without repercussion, these people will continue to be emboldened to sink to new depths of depravity.
I don't know about you, but having armed agents of the federal government in our streets, disappearing people without public trial, and able to murder law-abiding citizens with immunity, doesn't sound like democracy to me. It sounds an awful lot like a fascist state. And I'm terrified, because every step we take is another step closer to becoming a country which has the social infrastructure and legal precedent for everyday bigots to commit deadly hate crimes against minorities, and get away with it! Make no mistake. The real domestic terrorists are the armed thugs occupying our cities. Resisting them by nonviolent means - up to and including trying to escape what could be a deadly encounter with them - cannot be described as anything other than a patriotic act in defense of our fundamental liberties.
---
Before I finish, I have to address the mask issue, because it's another crystalline example of conservatives engaging in bad faith (isn't that a perfect description of conservatism on the whole - "bad faith"?), as well as their failure to hold to any kind of consistent principle. People have raised concerns about the way ICE agents - unlike regular law enforcement - are frequently masked, and reluctant to provide identification. I don't know what purpose is served by these agents wearing masks, but one can easily imagine that it increases their intimidation factor, while also shielding them from accountability for their actions as agents of the state - which is a reflection of the overall lack of transparency endemic to this agency (and the regime overall). On what grounds do conservatives defend these agents wearing masks when, during the COVID pandemic, they openly mocked and insulted progressives for doing the same thing?
Now, the issue here isn't whether you are for masks or against masks all the time or in any situation. It's a question of purpose. During the pandemic, the purpose of wearing a mask was to prevent the spread of an infectious disease. Why did conservatives reject masks then, yet support them now? (Other than to brainlessly counter whatever rational argument a progressive might make). Here are the facts: then, progressives wanted to prevent the spread of a potentially fatal illness; now, they want agents of the state to be held accountable for their actions. To disagree with these positions (as conservatives do) is to support the spread of disease, to value the intimidation of conscientious, law-abiding citizens by federalized agents with guns, and to reject accountaibility when those agents break the law, and violate our civil rights.
I know I'm biased - as we all are. But I just don't see how you can look at the facts and not come to the objective conclusion that conservatives are fundamentally evil - antisocial bullies who value chaos and the suffering of innocents. I know they say similar things about progressives - that we're leftist radicals who've taken leave of our senses. But again, there are not two sides to this issue. One of us is arguing in bad faith, and the other is not. One of us is right, and the other is wrong. The distinction is blatantly obvious, and it's not even close. The only way I can explain it is that - contrary to an idealistic view of the inherent good in humanity - in any population there are bound to be a range of people from the good to the bad. And it would seem that bad people are just inherently drawn to conservative politics.
Which side are you on?
The reason this strategy works is because the argument is sound - it's just deliberately misplaced. As I learned while studying philosophy in college, an argument founded on untrue premises can lead logically to a conclusion that is, however, very much untrue. If all ICE were doing was humanely deporting undocumented immigrants, then a focus on proper documentation would be a valid stance. One that you could agree or disagree with (personally, I think the harms are exaggerated, and I support a more empathetic solution in line with our country's historical character), but a valid one nonetheless.
They want you to think that this is all ICE is doing, because it's the only way they can at least pretend their argument has any real footing. But that's not what's really going on. In addition to their purported duties, ICE has been abducting documented immigrants, harassing and assaulting natural born citizens, spreading terror in American communities disproportionately inhabited by Democratic voters (this is not a coincidence), overstepping their authority as border guards (and not domestic law enforcement), recruiting with abysmally low standards and providing inadequate training, eschewing any commitment to transparency (while the administration boldly lies to the contrary) with regards to what goes on inside ICE facilities, how detainees are treated, and what happens to them when they are deported.
All of this is beyond the scope of merely enforcing the law as it is written, and this is what the American people are protesting. For the sake of all that is Good in the world, a white woman was just shot to death in the face by an ICE agent without due cause (the video evidence is all over the internet, so you can judge for yourself), and the administration - up to and including the office of the President of the United States himself - is spreading lies any citizen can debunk with their own eyes, maliciously slandering the innocent woman who was killed, and granting unqualified immunity to her shooter, while obstructing any and all attempts by local or state law enforcement to properly investigate the crime.
This is what enrages us! And conservatives are standing behind all of this egregious behavior, twisting themselves into pretzels to justify this state-sanctioned execution of a law-abiding citizen (in broad daylight!), utilizing bad faith arguments to create the illusion that this is a two-sided issue. And it is an illusion. A thinly-veiled one, at that. And as long as we permit this regime to continue to circumvent the law (and any standard of human decency) without repercussion, these people will continue to be emboldened to sink to new depths of depravity.
I don't know about you, but having armed agents of the federal government in our streets, disappearing people without public trial, and able to murder law-abiding citizens with immunity, doesn't sound like democracy to me. It sounds an awful lot like a fascist state. And I'm terrified, because every step we take is another step closer to becoming a country which has the social infrastructure and legal precedent for everyday bigots to commit deadly hate crimes against minorities, and get away with it! Make no mistake. The real domestic terrorists are the armed thugs occupying our cities. Resisting them by nonviolent means - up to and including trying to escape what could be a deadly encounter with them - cannot be described as anything other than a patriotic act in defense of our fundamental liberties.
---
Before I finish, I have to address the mask issue, because it's another crystalline example of conservatives engaging in bad faith (isn't that a perfect description of conservatism on the whole - "bad faith"?), as well as their failure to hold to any kind of consistent principle. People have raised concerns about the way ICE agents - unlike regular law enforcement - are frequently masked, and reluctant to provide identification. I don't know what purpose is served by these agents wearing masks, but one can easily imagine that it increases their intimidation factor, while also shielding them from accountability for their actions as agents of the state - which is a reflection of the overall lack of transparency endemic to this agency (and the regime overall). On what grounds do conservatives defend these agents wearing masks when, during the COVID pandemic, they openly mocked and insulted progressives for doing the same thing?
Now, the issue here isn't whether you are for masks or against masks all the time or in any situation. It's a question of purpose. During the pandemic, the purpose of wearing a mask was to prevent the spread of an infectious disease. Why did conservatives reject masks then, yet support them now? (Other than to brainlessly counter whatever rational argument a progressive might make). Here are the facts: then, progressives wanted to prevent the spread of a potentially fatal illness; now, they want agents of the state to be held accountable for their actions. To disagree with these positions (as conservatives do) is to support the spread of disease, to value the intimidation of conscientious, law-abiding citizens by federalized agents with guns, and to reject accountaibility when those agents break the law, and violate our civil rights.
I know I'm biased - as we all are. But I just don't see how you can look at the facts and not come to the objective conclusion that conservatives are fundamentally evil - antisocial bullies who value chaos and the suffering of innocents. I know they say similar things about progressives - that we're leftist radicals who've taken leave of our senses. But again, there are not two sides to this issue. One of us is arguing in bad faith, and the other is not. One of us is right, and the other is wrong. The distinction is blatantly obvious, and it's not even close. The only way I can explain it is that - contrary to an idealistic view of the inherent good in humanity - in any population there are bound to be a range of people from the good to the bad. And it would seem that bad people are just inherently drawn to conservative politics.
Which side are you on?
08 January, 2026
A Very Unhappy New Year
Democracy is governance of, by, and for the people. When federal agents mistakenly believe that they work for the president (a man who, himself, believes he is beholden to no one), and not the people, the inevitable result is that they will eventually be used as a weapon against the people. This is the truest perversion of democracy imaginable. I'm posting today for no other reason than I want this to be documented for posterity. Three weeks past the legal deadline, the Epstein files are still being slow-dripped with extensive redactions, in a blatant disregard for justice and accountability. We are barely a week into the New Year, and already Trump has started a war by abducting the president of another country; is threatening the military takeover of a NATO ally, which puts global security at risk, mounting tensions for a third world war; and today I am glued to YouTube watching rioters in Minneapolis because federal agents have begun gunning down US citizens in our streets, while the regime is busy spreading propaganda (read: their usual, egregious lies) to spin the situation in their favor. Ladies and gentlemen, it has arrived. Welcome to the Fascist American Dystopia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
